Back

Detection and Measurement of Hypopyon on Slit Lamp Examination Versus Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Reddy, K. N.; Ibukun, F.; Huang, K.; Yi, J.; Jain, E.; Kuyyadiyil, S.; Parmar, G. S.; Shekhawat, N. S.

2026-04-17 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350185 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo compare hypopyon detection using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) versus slit lamp examination (SLE) in microbial keratitis, and to evaluate intra- and inter-grader agreement for ASOCT hypopyon measurement. MethodsTwo masked graders independently evaluated ASOCT images for hypopyon presence or absence in eyes with microbial keratitis, with disagreements resolved by consensus. A subset of hypopyon eyes underwent triplicate height measurement using two methods (endothelial length, vertical height). Cohens kappa, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated comparing diagnostic performance of ASOCT versus SLE. ResultsInter-grader agreement for hypopyon detection on ASOCT was excellent ({kappa}=0.94; 95% CI 0.84-1.00) and intra-grader agreement was excellent ({kappa}=0.89-1.00). ASOCT detected hypopyon in 67.1% of eyes versus 57.0% by SLE (sensitivity 83.0%, specificity 96.2% using ASOCT as reference). Intra-grader reproducibility was excellent for both endothelial length and vertical height measurements (ICC 0.977-0.996). Inter-grader agreement was good for endothelial length (ICC 0.831) and vertical height (ICC 0.827), though a statistically significant inter-grader bias was identified for vertical height only (Wilcoxon p=0.008). ConclusionsASOCT detected hypopyon with greater sensitivity than SLE and demonstrated excellent intra-grader and good inter-grader measurement reproducibility. Endothelial length showed slightly superior inter-grader concordance to vertical height measurement.

Published in Bioengineering (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.