Back

Adherence to International Pharmacogenomic Recommendations in Paediatric Cancer Care: A Cohort Analysis Embedded Within the MARVEL-PIC Randomised Trial

Chawla, A.; Carter, S.; Dyas, R.; Williams, E.; Moore, C.; Conyers, R.

2026-04-16 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.15.26348678 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Pharmacogenomic testing (PGx) can optimise drug efficacy and minimise toxicity, but the extent of prescriber adherence to PGx recommendations remains unclear. We aimed to quantify clinician adherence to international genotype-guided prescribing recommendations in a cohort of paediatric oncology patients. Methods: We reviewed files of children enrolled in the MARVEL-PIC (NCT05667766) randomised control trial, who had PGx recommendations available. Patients were included if 12 weeks had passed since their PGx report was released to clinicians. Prescribing events were identified for actionable PGx recommendations, and classified as "explicitly followed", "inadvertently followed", or "not followed". Adherence was assessed by patient, drug, and recommendation. Results: 2,063 PGx recommendations were available for 216 patients. 64 (3.1%) recommendations were actionable for 44 patients and 10 drugs within the 12-week study period. Recommendations were explicitly followed in 57/288 (19.8%) of prescribing events, inadvertently followed in 145 (50.3%), and not followed in 86 (29.9%). Mercaptopurine demonstrated the highest rate of explicit adherence (87.5%). No significant associations were observed between adherence and age group, cancer type, drug type, or strength of recommendation. Conclusion: Adherence to pharmacogenomic recommendations was very low, highlighting the need to understand barriers to PGx implementation, and consideration of clinical decision supports to facilitate adherence.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%