Back

Development of a transformation model to analyze horizontal saccades using electrooculography through correlation between video-oculography and electrooculography

Kim, D. Y.; Kim, T.-J.; Kim, Y.; Yoo, J.; Jeong, J.; Lee, S.-U.; Choi, J. Y.

2026-04-16 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350920 medRxiv
Show abstract

Saccadic eye movements are established biomarkers in neuroscience and clinical neurology, where video-oculography (VOG) remains the gold standard. However, VOG's high cost, bulky equipment, and poor portability restrict its clinical utility. Electrooculography (EOG) offers a promising alternative by detecting cornea-retinal potential changes during eye movements. To enable quantitative saccadic analysis using EOG as a VOG alternative, this study develops and validates a mathematical transformation model converting EOG data into VOG-equivalent values. A prospective observational study was conducted on 4 healthy adults without neurological or sleep disorders. Horizontal saccades were recorded simultaneously using EOG and VOG during controlled gaze shifts. EOG peak saccadic velocity was derived from voltage change rate, whereas VOG was calculated from angular displacement over time. A derivation dataset of fixed horizontal saccades ({+/-}20{degrees}) formulated the transformation model, achieving a strong correlation coefficient (r = 0.95 rightward, r = 0.93 leftward, p < 0.0001). Multiple filter settings were evaluated, and 0.3 Hz high-pass and 35 Hz low-pass filtering were identified as optimal. The fixed horizontal saccades derived model was applied to a validation dataset of random horizontal saccades, confirming robustness across saccades without significant differences from VOG measurements. These findings establish EOG's feasibility for quantitative analysis of horizontal saccades and provide a validated transformation model. By systematically optimizing filtering parameters, this approach enables EOG as a cost-effective VOG alternative while maintaining high-precision measurement accuracy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
2
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%