Beyond skills: The impact of personality traits, empathy and stress mindset on OSCE outcomes
Henderson, D.; Lignier, B.; Moxham, B.; Plaisant, O.; OSCEs study group, U. P. C.; Buffel du Vaure, C.; Faye, A.; Bouzid, D.; Lemogne, C.; Guedon, A.
Show abstract
Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are widely used to assess medical students clinical skills, including non-technical abilities such as communication and empathy. However, the potential influence of individual psychological traits--such as personality dimensions, empathy, and stress-related mindset--on OSCE performance remains understudied. This study investigated associations between personality traits, empathy levels, stress mindsets, and performance in OSCEs among medical students. An online questionnaire (including the Big Five Personality Traits Inventory 2, the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (Medical Student version), the Growth Mindset Scale, the Stress Mindset Measure) was provided to all fifth-year medical students enrolled at the Universite Paris Cite for six weeks before undertaking graduation summative OSCEs. Their scores were correlated with OSCE performance using Spearmans correlation and linear regression analyses. A total of 99 questionnaires were included and analysed. None of the psychometric tests we assessed showed a significant correlation with OSCE scores. The strongest predictors of success in OSCEs were higher scores in written examinations, previous OSCE performance, and being female. In non-interactive OSCE stations, conscientiousness was the only significant predictor, with a positive association (p=0.001). Neuroticism was positively associated with performance improvement between OSCE sessions (p=0.042). Personality traits, self-reported empathy, and stress-related mindsets do not predict success in OSCEs as isolated traits. Further research is needed to determine whether it holds true for all kinds of OSCEs. Multidimensional psychometric assessment may be relevant when investigating performance outcomes in OSCEs.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 95%
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health and burnout during medical school: Longitudinal evolution and covariates 96%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 93%
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions 94%
- Socio-educational Impact and Psychological Distress of Medical Students amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Japanese Cross-Sectional Survey 94%
- Substantial SF-36 score differences according to the mode of administration of the questionnaire: an ancillary study of the SENTIPAT multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing web-based questionnaire self-completion and telephone interview 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.