The Madrid Manic Group (MadManic) Cohort: Multi-Omics and Digital Phenotyping For the Studies of Severe Mental Disorders and Suicidality
Garcia-Ortiz, I.; Somavilla Cabrero, R.; Madridejos Palomares, E.; Martinez-Jimenez, M.; Bello Sousa, R. A.; Carpio-Lopez, I.; Sanchez-Alonso, S.; Benavente Lopez, S.; Mata-Iturralde, L.; Alvarez Garcia, R.; Romero-Miguel, D.; Jimenez Munoz, L.; Di Stasio, E.; Ortega Heras, A. J.; de la Fuente Rodriguez, S.; Aguilar Castillo, I.; Lara Fernandez, A.; Clarke Gil, I.; Vaquero Lorenzo, C.; Hoffmann, P.; Lopez de la Hoz, C.; Borge Garcia, N.; Abad Valle, J.; Sanchez Alonso, M. J.; Arroyo Bello, E.; Jimenez Peral, R.; de Granda Beltran, A. M.; Fullerton, J. M.; Bermejo Bermejo, M.; Albarracin-Garcia
Show abstract
Severe mental disorders (SMDs), including bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder, are highly complex conditions associated with a substantial clinical burden and an increased suicide risk. Here, we present the Madrid Manic Cohort (MadManic), a large-scale initiative from Spain designed to integrate genomic, multi-omics, clinical, and digital phenotyping data to investigate the biological basis and clinical heterogeneity of SMDs. The cohort is still expanding and currently includes over 4,400 participants ([~]2,300 psychiatric patients and [~]2,100 controls) and >11,000 biospecimens. Genotyping, transcriptomic and epigenetic data are available for different subsets of the cohort. By establishing the MadManic cohort we aim to integrate molecular data with detailed clinical and longitudinal digital information, allowing a more precise characterization of patient subgroups based on biological and phenotypic profiles. The MadManic cohort is well positioned to contribute to major international efforts in psychiatric genetics by enhancing the representation of Southern European populations, and advancing the identification of genetic risk, clinical predictors, and pharmacogenomic markers of treatment response. This cohort represents a valuable resource for advancing precision psychiatry, with the potential to improve risk prediction and guide personalized interventions in SMDs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 96%
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 95%
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic and Genetic Profiling of Comorbidity Patterns among Substance Dependence Diagnoses 95%
- Genetic Analysis of Psychosis Biotypes: Shared Ancestry-Adjusted Polygenic Risk and Unique Genomic Associations 95%
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-continental environmental and genome-wide association study on children and adolescent anxiety and depression 94%
- Decoding the multimorbidities among psychiatric disorders and cognitive functioning 94%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metacognition and the effect of incentive motivation in two compulsive disorders: gambling disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder 92%
- Mendelian randomization analyses uncover causal relationships between brain structural connectome and risk of psychiatric disorders 92%
- Cortical gradient perturbation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder correlates with neurotransmitter-, cell type-specific and chromosome- transcriptomic signatures 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.