Back

Plasma proteomics improves prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events

Liu, Y.; Foguet, C.; Ben-Eghan, C.; Persyn, E.; Richards, M.; Wu, Z.; Lambert, S. A.; Butterworth, A. S.; Wood, A.; Di Angelantonio, E.; Inouye, M.; Ritchie, S. C.

2026-04-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350861 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Aims Despite treatment, patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are at high risk of recurrent events. Existing clinical risk scores for recurrence provide only moderate predictive performance and rely largely on the same conventional risk factors used to predict disease onset. Proteomics is a promising source of new biomarkers but the technologies need focused use cases in order to achieve utility and implementation. We aimed to determine whether plasma proteomics improves prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events beyond established clinical risk models in secondary prevention in a population-scale cohort. Methods Plasma proteomic profiles from ~9,300 participants in the UK Biobank with established ASCVD at baseline were analysed using machine learning methods to derive and evaluate proteomic predictors of recurrent cardiovascular events. The top performing model comprised proteins with non-zero weights (full protein score). Predictive performance of the proteomic predictors, an established clinical risk score (SMART2), and their combination was evaluated across six pre-defined testing datasets representing multiple ethnic and geographic groups. A parsimonious set of proteins with existing clinical-grade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) available was then derived. Results The full protein score achieved higher performance for recurrent ASCVD than the SMART2 risk score across all ethnic and geographic subgroups (mean C-index 0.743 vs 0.653). Adding the full protein score to SMART2 improved discrimination, with the largest increase in White Irish participants ({Delta}C-index, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.074-0.205; P<0.001). However, adding SMART2 to the protein score provided minimal additional value. The parsimonious score preserved most of the discrimination of the full protein model with C-indices of the recurrent ASCVD risk model comprising age, sex and the parsimonious protein score being nearly identical to the full protein model in the largest testing set (0.723 vs 0.728 for White British in England and Wales). The parsimonious protein score showed a marked gradient of risk with the top, middle and bottom quintiles showing 10-year recurrent ASCVD rates of ~27.4%, ~9.6% and ~2.4%, respectively. Conclusions In patients with established ASCVD, plasma protein measurements substantially improved prediction of recurrent events beyond conventional clinical risk factors, supporting their potential as a complementary tool to guide secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
3
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
16
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
21
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%