Back

Estimating habitat-constrained home range size in semi-aquatic mammals: a case study on the critically endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola).

Bodinier, R.; Aulagnier, S.; Bressan, Y.; Beaubert, R.; Fournier-Chambrillon, C.; Devillard, S.; Fournier, P.

2026-04-15 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.13.718143 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate home range knowledge is essential for conserving species that are highly dependent on certain types of habitats. The critically endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola) is a wetland specialist whose movements are constrained by riparian and wetland habitats. In dendritic landscapes, conventional home range estimators such as Minimum Convex Polygons tend to include unsuitable habitats in estimated home ranges. Using VHF telemetry data from 16 individual-years tracked in France between 1996-1999 and 2020-2022, we compared four methods: Kernel Density Estimator (KDE), an adaptative sphere-of-influence local convex hull (a-LoCoH), a newly developed Ecological Home Range method (EHR), and a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) approach integrating hydrographic covariates. Our objective is to determine which method best accounts for the European minks specialization in wetlands, considering the spatial distribution of locations. Evaluation with wetland-specific metrics showed KDE consistently overestimated range extent and included unsuitable habitats, and a-LoCoH yielded mixed results, but these indicated that the method was not effective in excluding unused habitats. It was EHR and GAM methods that aligned more closely with ecological constraints. We therefore recommend GAM because it matches our objective and has the capacity to integrate additional environmental variables. Using the GAM, male home ranges averaged 3,074 ha--26 times larger than female ranges (116 ha)-- and were significantly larger in river than marsh landscapes. These are the largest ranges reported for the species. Large spatial requirements heighten vulnerability to road fatality and predation, both significant threats for remaining French populations. Our findings highlight the need for conservation strategies that integrate precise, habitat-based range estimates. The GAM method offers a robust, adaptable framework for managing European mink and other semi-aquatic species in complex landscapes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
6
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
13
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
14
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
19
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%