Back

Agent-Guided De Novo Design of Nanobody Binders Against a Novel Cancer Target

Zhao, Y.; Yilmaz, M.; Lee, E.; Teh, C.; Guo, L.; Sonmez, K.; Giancardo, L.; Trang, G.; Xu, F.; Espinosa-Cotton, M.; Cheung, N.-K.; Kim, J.; Cheng, X.

2026-04-17 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.13.717816 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Therapeutic antibody discovery remains slow and resource-intensive, with traditional methods providing limited control over epitope selection. We present a workflow for de novo nanobody design applied to a novel Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor target encompassing four stages: (1) epitope identification guided by our hotspot recommendation agent using physical chemistry-based structure and sequence analysis tools with two curated databases (IEDB, PFAM), (2) de novo nanobody generation using three independent methods (RFantibody, IgGM, mBER) across multiple predicted antigen structures and nanobody frameworks, (3) multi-metric scoring including structural metrics from folding models, and in silico binding affinity from our sequence-based predictor, (4) high-throughput yeast surface display (YSD) screening followed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) characterization of the specific binders. We generated 288,000 nanobody designs spanning eight target epitope regions and three variable domains of heavy chain-only antibody (VHH) frameworks. Multi-objective Pareto filtering with our candidate selection agent yielded 100,000 candidates for YSD screening with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Of 116 enriched candidates advanced to SPR characterization, 46/116 (39.7%) produced reliable kinetic fits with Rmax [≥] 30 RU, yielding KD values from 0.66 nM to 305 nM (median 31.7 nM). These results show that an agent-guided computational workflow can design nanomolar to sub-nanomolar nanobody binders against a novel target without experimental structure or prior antibody information.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
51.6%
50% of probability mass above
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.3%
3
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
7
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
21
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.6%