Back

Energy and heterogeneity shape bird taxonomic and functional gamma-diversity patterns across landscapes in Finland

Cours, J.; Lehikoinen, A.; Burgas, D.; Heikkinen, R. K.; Elo, M.; Versluijs, M.; Duflot, R.

2026-04-16 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.13.717752 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimOur aim was to study the effects of energy availability and landscape habitat heterogeneity on bird taxonomic and functional gamma-diversity and propose conservation guidelines based on the results. LocationSouthern and Central Finland Time Period2009-2020 Major Taxa StudiedBirds MethodsWe derived biodiversity variables from bird monitoring line transects to assess the effects of latitude, longitude, and landscape composition, configuration, and heterogeneity at multiple spatial scales: 100, 500, 2,000, and 5,000 m. We tested the effects of these landscape metrics on the total community, bird ecological guilds (species richness and abundance), functional diversity, and overall species specialization index. ResultsWe found clear evidence supporting a positive effect of energy (latitude and soil fertility) and habitat amount on bird abundances. Our results also revealed a northward increasing trend in functional diversity and species specialization. Habitat heterogeneity positively affected both bird abundance and species richness. Heterogeneity of land cover types was shown to promote abundances, while functional measure of landscape heterogeneity was positively connected to species richness. Land use with high anthropogenic activities, such as urban areas and cropland, negatively affected forest specialists and species sensitive to human activities. Main ConclusionsEnergy and habitat heterogeneity and amount are major mutually nonexclusive factors shaping bird communities in Finnish landscapes. Nonetheless, certain land use types favour some guilds while excluding others (for example, urbanized areas or cropland favouring open area species while excluding old-growth forest specialists), showing that biodiversity conservation is a matter of specialized landscapes. Furthermore, different measures of landscape heterogeneity demonstrated positive relationships with the studied bird guilds, highlighting the consistency of the species-heterogeneity relationship.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
10
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
11
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
13
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
18
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%