Inter-scanner reproducibility of brain multifrequency MR elastography
Murk, S.; Laun, F. B.; Rampp, S.; Vossiek, M.; Schattenfroh, J.; Guo, J.; Sack, I.; Dörfler, A.; Fle, G.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSBrain magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an emerging quantitative neuroimaging technique that provides noninvasive maps of brain tissue viscoelasticity. For multi-center applications, robust cross-site reproducibility across scanner platforms is essential but remains insufficiently characterized. PurposeTo evaluate cross-site reproducibility of brain multifrequency MRE measurements between two MRI scanner platforms using harmonized protocols. Study TypeProspective cross-site test-retest reproducibility study. Study PopulationSixteen healthy adult volunteers (7 men, 9 women; mean age 32.2 {+/-} 8.0 years). Field Strength/Sequence3 T systems (Siemens MAGNETOM Cima.X and MAGNETOM Vida at two sites) with identical brain multifrequency MRE sequences, echo-planar imaging (EPI) readout, and standardized driver configuration. AssessmentEach participant underwent one MRE acquisition at each site. Shear wave speed (SWS) and penetration rate (PR) were quantified in whole brain, white matter, subcortical gray matter, and cortical gray matter regions using atlas-based region-of-interest (ROI) analysis in MNI152 space. Statistical TestsAbsolute relative difference (ARD), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots were calculated to determine cross-site reproducibility. ResultsCross-site reproducibility was robust for major brain regions, with region-averaged ARD values for SWS ranging from 1.38 % to 3.43 % and for PR from 3.20 % to 7.25 % across tissues. RDCs for SWS ranged from 0.02 m.s-1 to 0.07 m.s-1, and for PR from 0.03 m.s-1 to 0.08 m.s-1. Coefficients of variation for SWS ranged from 0.82 % to 1.93 %, and for PR from 2.21 % to 4.09 %. ICC values for SWS ranged from 0.66 to 0.84 and for PR from 0.67 to 0.88. Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal systematic bias and tight limits of agreement. ConclusionBrain multifrequency MRE demonstrates robust reproducibility across distinct 3 T platforms when using harmonized acquisition and reconstruction. These results support the use of brain MRE as a quantitative biomarker and provide benchmark reproducibility metrics for future research.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: results from the UK7T study 97%
- Error quantification in multi-parameter mapping facilitates robust estimation and enhanced group level sensitivity 97%
- Investigating the Effect of Flow Compensation and Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Method on the Accuracy of Venous Susceptibility Measurement 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of in-scanner head pose changes during structural MRI using a convolutional neural network trained on eye tracker video 96%
- Influence of preprocessing, distortion correction and cardiac triggering on the quality of diffusion MR images of spinal cord 96%
- Increased Brain Volumetric Measurement Precision from Multi-Site 3D T1-weighted 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Correcting Geometric Distortions 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Motion Correction and Automatic Segmentation of Penetrating Arteries in Phase Contrast MRI at 7 T 96%
- Combining Navigator and Optical Prospective Motion Correction for High-Quality 500 μm Resolution Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping at 7T 96%
- QSMxT: Robust Masking and Artefact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.