Back

Understanding response to treatment in depression: Insights from the Pakistani DIVERGE study

Umar, M.; Hussain, F.; Khizar, B.; Khan, I.; Khan, F.; Cotic, M.; Chan, L.; Hussain, A.; Ali, M. N.; Gill, S. A.; Mustafa, A. B.; Dogar, I. A.; Nizami, A. T.; Haq, M. M. u.; Mufti, K.; Ansari, M. A.; Hussain, M. I.; Choudhary, S. T.; Maqsood, N.; Rasool, G.; Ali, H.; Ilyas, M.; Tariq, M.; Shafiq, S.; Khan, A. A.; Rashid, S.; Ahmad, H.; Bettani, K. U.; Khan, M. K.; Choudhary, A. R.; Mehdi, M.; Shakoor, A.; Mehmood, N.; Mufti, A. A.; Bhatia, M. R.; Ali, M.; Khan, M. A.; Alam, N.; Naqvi, S. Q.-i.-H.; Mughal, N.; Ilyas, N.; Channar, P.; Ijaz, P.; Din, A.; Agha, H.; Channa, S.; Ambreen, S.; Rehman,

2026-04-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350625 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD), a leading cause of disability worldwide, exhibits substantial heterogeneity in treatment outcomes. Patients who do not respond to standard antidepressant therapy account for the majority of MDDs disease burden. Risk factors have been implicated in treatment response, including genes impacting on how antidepressants are metabolised. Yet, despite its clinical importance, risk factors for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remain unexplored in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We used data from the DIVERGE study on MDD to investigate the risk factors of TRD in Pakistan. MethodsDIVERGE is a genetic epidemiological study that recruited adult MDD patients ([≥]18 years) between Sep 27,2021 to Jun 30, 2025, from psychiatric care facilities across Pakistan. Detailed phenotypic information was collected by trained interviewers and blood samples taken. Infinium Global Diversity Array with Enhanced PGx-8 from Illumina was used for genotyping followed by DRAGEN calling to infer metaboliser phenotypes for Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme genes. We defined TRD as minimal to no improvement after [≥]12 weeks of adherent antidepressant therapy. We conducted multi-level logistic regression to test the association of demographic, clinical and pharmacogenetic variables with TRD. FindingsAmong 3,677 eligible patients, polypharmacy was rampant; 86% were prescribed another psychotropic drug along with an antidepressant. Psychological therapies were uncommon (6%) while 49% of patients had previously visited to a religious leader/faith healer in relation to their mental health problems. TRD was experienced by 34% (95%CI: 32-36%) patients. The TRD group was characterised by more psychotic symptoms and suicidal behaviour (OR=1.39, 95%CI=1.04-1.84, p=0.02; OR=1.03, 95%CI=1.01-1.05, p=0.005). Social support (OR=0.55, 95%CI=0.44-0.69, p=1.4x10-7) and parents being first cousins (OR=0.81, 95%CI=0.69-0.96, p=0.01) were associated with lower odds of TRD. In 1,085 patients with CYP enzyme data, poor (OR=1.85, 95%CI=1.11-3.07, p=0.01) and ultra-rapid (OR=3.11, 95%CI=1.59-6.12, p=0.0009) metabolizers for CYP2C19 had increased risk of TRD compared with normal metabolisers. InterpretationThere was an excessive use of polypharmacy in the treatment of depression while psychological therapies were uncommon highlighting the need for more evidence-based practice. This first large study of MDD from Pakistan uncovered the importance of culture-specific forms of social support in preventing TRD, highlighting opportunities for interventions in low-income settings. Pharmacogenetic markers can be leveraged to predict TRD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.2%
3
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
5
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
6
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
14
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
15
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%