Back

bifrost: an R package for scalable inference of phylogenetic shifts in multivariate evolutionary dynamics

Berv, J. S.; Fox, N.; Thorstensen, M. J.; Lloyd-Laney, H.; Troyer, E. M.; Rivero-Vega, R. A.; Smith, S. A.; Friedman, M.; Fouhey, D. F.; Weeks, B. C.

2026-04-14 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.12.718036 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIHigh-dimensional comparative datasets, including geometric morphometric landmarks, functional traits, and other large trait datasets, are increasingly common in biology. When these datasets include a large number of traits relative to the number of taxa, they pose significant challenges for phylogenetic comparative analysis. In addition, evolutionary dynamics are often heterogeneous across phylogenies, challenging researchers to develop tools that can localize and account for such variation when investigating hypotheses of evolutionary change. C_LIO_LIWe present bifrost, an R package for detecting and characterizing shifts in multivariate trait evolution across phylogenetic trees. bifrost implements a stepwise greedy search over alternative macroevolutionary regime configurations on a phylogeny. Candidate shifts are proposed and assessed at internal nodes, accelerated with parallel model fitting where possible, and aggregated sequentially when they exceed a user-defined information-criterion acceptance threshold. C_LIO_LIThe underlying model is a scalar-rate multivariate Brownian motion process fit by generalized least squares using mvMORPH::mvgls [1]. Our framework also provides support estimates for individual shifts using information-criterion weights. C_LIO_LIWe illustrate the workflow using a fossil-tip-dated phylogeny and high-dimensional landmark data for early bony fish jaws (32,508 scalar coordinate values), and discuss tuning, outputs, and limitations. bifrost extends existing phylogenetic comparative frameworks for evolutionary analysis and provides a scalable pipeline for exploring the phylogenetic natural history of large multivariate datasets. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
16
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%