U-Probe: universal agentic probe design for imaging-based spatial-omics
Zhang, Q.; Cai, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Wei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Su, W.; Qi, W.; Qiu, X.; Cao, G.; Xu, W.
Show abstract
Probe design for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) underpins spatial transcriptomics, three-dimensional genome studies, and clinical diagnostics, yet remains constrained by two challenges: dependence on expert knowledge for parameter selection and quality evaluation, and the inability of existing tools to accommodate the diverse probe architectures introduced by rapidly emerging methods. Here we present U-Probe, a universal and agentic probe design platform. U-Probe employs a declarative configuration system with a directed acyclic graph (DAG)-based assembly engine that supports arbitrary probe structures from established protocols such as MERFISH, seqFISH, and MiP-seq to entirely novel architectures without code modifications. Integrated LLM-based AI agents enable conversational design workflows, allowing users to specify experimental goals in natural language and receive synthesis-ready probe sequences. We validated U-Probe in three scenarios: agent-driven MiP-seq panel design for influenza-infected mouse lung tissue, genome-tiling DNA-FISH for herpesvirus detection, and a novel RCA-based ligation probe for single-nucleotide mutation discrimination. U-Probe is available as an open-source tool with CLI, Web, and agent interfaces.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-modal image analysis for large scale cancer tissue studies within IMMUcan 93%
- SELINA: Single-cell Assignment using Multiple-Adversarial Domain Adaptation Network with Large-scale References 92%
- Clustering-independent estimation of cell abundances in bulk tissues using single-cell RNA-seq data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.