Back

SPLIT: Safety Prioritization for Long COVID Drug Repurposing via a Causal Integrated Targeting Framework

Pinero, S. L.; Li, X.; Lee, S. H.; Liu, L.; Li, J.; Le, T. D.

2026-04-16 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.12.26350701 medRxiv
Show abstract

Long COVID affects millions of people worldwide, yet no disease-modifying treatment has been approved, and existing interventions have shown only modest and inconsistent benefits. A key reason for this limited progress is that current computational drug repurposing pipelines do not match well with the clinical reality of Long COVID. These patients often have persistent, multisystemic symptoms and may already be taking multiple medications, making treatment safety a primary concern. However, most repurposing workflows still treat safety as a downstream filter and rely on disease-associated targets rather than causal drivers. They also assume that the findings of one analysis would generalize across the diverse presentations of Long COVID. We introduce SPLIT, a safety-first repurposing framework that addresses these limitations. SPLIT prioritizes safety at the start of the candidate evaluation, integrates complementary causal inference strategies to identify likely driver genes, and uses a counterfactual substitution design to compare drugs within specific cohort contexts. When applied to cognitive and respiratory Long COVID cohorts, SPLIT revealed three main findings. First, drugs with similar predicted efficacy could have very different predicted safety profiles. Second, the drugs flagged as unfavorable were often different between the two cohorts, showing that drug prioritization is phenotype-specific. Third, SPLIT flagged 18 drugs currently under active investigation in Long COVID trials as having unfavorable predicted profiles. SPLIT provides a practical framework to identify safer, more context-appropriate candidates earlier in the process, supporting more targeted and better-tolerated treatment strategies for Long COVID.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.2%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
4
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
11
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
16
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
25
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%