Back

The influence of tension-compression switches on brain anisotropic modelling

Li, C.; Zhou, Z.

2026-04-14 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.10.717701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Finite element (FE) head models are valuable tools for investigating brain injury mechanics, with their reliability critically dependent on accurate material modelling. White matter (WM) is often considered mechanically anisotropic due to its aligned axonal fiber architecture and is commonly represented using fiber-reinforced hyperelastic formulations such as the Gasser-Ogden-Holzapfel (GOH) model. A fundamental assumption of the GOH model is that fibers contribute only in tension and not in compression, requiring the use of tension-compression switches. However, inconsistencies were noted in the formulation of tension-compression switches with the influence on computational biomechanics unknown. To address this knowledge gap, three commonly used switching schemes - differing in both the switching parameter and the treatment of compressed fibers - were theoretically elaborated and numerical implementation within the GOH framework to simulate the mechanical anisotropy of WM in impact simulations. Results from the case-based and group-level analyses demonstrated that both the switching parameter and the treatment of compressed fibers affected WM deformation. Significant cross-scheme strain differences were noted in the first principal strain at the element level and fiber strain at the fiber level. These findings highlighted the mechanical role of tension-compression switch in the GOH-based brain modelling and advocated the adoption of fiber stretch itself as the switching parameter to discriminate the tensile and compressive fibers. The current study provides important guidance for the anisotropic constitutive models in brain tissue and calls for direct verification of the tension-compression switch hypothesis in axonal fibers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
8
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%