Back

A PSMA-Targeted Up-conversion Nanoplatform for Deep-Tissue dual activation Photodynamic and Sonodynamic Therapy of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Prasad, P. N.; Aalinkeel, R.; Ghazaeian, M.; Das, R. K.; Pandey, R. K.; Mahajan, S. D.; Dukh, M.; Cheng, Y.; Kuzmin, A.; Pliss, A.; Schwartz, S. A.; Xia, J.

2026-04-13 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.10.717693 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prostate-specific photodynamic therapy (PDT) is limited by poor light penetration in deep-seated tumors. To address this, we report a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted nanotheranostic platform (UCNPs@mSiO2/HPPH@TCS) that enables near-infrared (NIR)-activated PDT and ultrasound-mediated sonodynamic therapy (SDT). The platform integrates NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ up-conversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) coated with mesoporous silica to convert 980 nm NIR light for deep tissue penetration. The clinically approved agent HPPH (Photochlor) serves as both photosensitizer and sonosensitizer, while a PSMA-targeted chitosan shell ensures selective tumor uptake and high loading efficiency (>90%). Physicochemical characterization confirmed a uniform core-shell structure ([~]63 nm). Tissue-mimicking depth studies demonstrate that SDT and 980 nm PDT significantly outperformed conventional 665 nm PDT, with SDT generating superior total reactive oxygen species (ROS). In vitro results showed PSMA-dependent uptake, lysosomal localization, and enhanced therapeutic responses in PSMA+ LNCaP cells. Three-dimensional spheroid models further validate the therapeutic ability of our nanoformulation (NF), demonstrating rapid structural collapse (even in large spheroids [~]2.6 mm) through apoptosis. Notably, SDT demonstrated earlier apoptosis and more uniform penetration compared to PDT, consistent with superior ROS generation. Collectively, these findings identify SDT as a promising deep-tissue activation strategy and highlight PSMA-targeted UCNPs NF as candidates for penetration-enhanced precision therapy in prostate cancer.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
7
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
9
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
15
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
21
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
24
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Angewandte Chemie
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%