Back

Upregulating action semantics with neuromodulation and gesture observation to facilitate verb retrieval in aphasia

Dresang, H. C.; Buxbaum, L. J.; Hamilton, R. H.

2026-04-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.10.716321 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although many individuals with chronic aphasia respond to language therapy, there remains a need for adjunctive interventions that can enhance treatment response. Approaches targeting multiple modalities, such as gesture cueing, and neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, have shown promise for supporting language recovery. The present pilot study investigated whether enhancing activation of the action semantic network could facilitate verb production in individuals with chronic aphasia. Participants were recruited as a convenience sample and completed a within-subject design in which all individuals received each condition. Two non-linguistic methods of activating the action semantic network were evaluated: (1) pantomimed gesture cues to prime action concepts and (2) intermittent theta-burst stimulation to the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), an intact action-semantic network node in our participants. We examined individual and combined effects of gesture priming and stimulation to test whether a combined approach would yield additive or interactive benefits. Using a Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects model, we observed a moderate interaction between gesture priming and stimulation site. Contrary to predictions, combining gesture priming with pMTG stimulation did not produce additional benefits over either intervention alone. Instead, pMTG stimulation attenuated the priming advantage observed under vertex stimulation, and gesture priming attenuated the advantage observed with pMTG stimulation alone. Posterior estimates provided substantial preliminary evidence for this interaction in our pilot sample size. These findings suggest that combined activation of the action semantic network through gesture and neuromodulation approaches may not benefit verb retrieval above and beyond each approach alone.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
2
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
9
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
11
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
22
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%