Benefit take-up in the last year of life: a population-based study using linked data for England and Wales
Davies, J. M.; Fairs, A.; Ayoubkhani, D.; Marshall, S.; Diggle, M.; Bradshaw, A.; French, M.; Stone, J.; Hussain, J.; Fimister, G.; Harding, R.; Sleeman, K.; Nafilyan, V.
Show abstract
ContextIn the UK, and in other countries, people living with a terminal illness are eligible for financial support to help with the costs of serious illness and to support their dignity and independence. This study investigates the take-up of benefits in the last year of life and identifies sociodemographic, clinical, and geographical factors associated with underclaiming. MethodsRetrospective cohort study using linked mortality, Census and benefits data for all people who died aged 16+ from chronic illnesses in England and Wales between 1 May 2018 and 30 April 2021. Outcome was receipt of non-means tested disability benefits in the last 12 months of life. We describe geographical variation in take up, and association with sociodemographic, clinical and geographical exposures using Poisson models. FindingsOur population included 1,049,493 eligible decedents, with an overall take-up rate of 65.9%. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, variation in take-up by cause of death was wide: liver disease 44% (95% CI 43-45%), heart failure 52% (51-52%), cancer 62% (61-62%), dementia 75% (74-75%), and neurodegenerative diseases 90% (88-91%). Across Local Authorities, the age-and-sex-standardised take-up varied from 53% to 78%; rates were generally higher in more deprived areas, but not uniformly. ConclusionsIn England and Wales, 1 in 3 people who die from expected causes (120,000 each year) do not receive the benefits for which they are eligible. Our analysis uses novel data linkages and highlights clinical and sociodemographic groups and geographical areas that could be targeted with proactive take-up initiatives.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 95%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 95%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Place, cause and expectedness of death and relationship to the deceased are associated with poorer experiences of end-of-life care and challenges in early bereavement: Risk factors from an online survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- “Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really” – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study 91%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality of Care Home Residents and Community-Dwelling Controls During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Matched Cohort Study 95%
- Changing dynamics of COVID-19 deaths during the SARS-CoV2 B.1.617.2 (Delta variant) outbreak in England and Wales: Reduced COVID-19 deaths among the Care Home residents 92%
- Clinical Suspicion of COVID-19 in Nursing Home residents: symptoms and mortality risk factors 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care 94%
- Associations between area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and COVID-19 disease consequences in Sydney, Australia: A retrospective cohort analysis 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on psychosocial factors, health, and lifestyle in Scottish octogenarians: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 94%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 90%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.