Back

Abscess Complications and Prolonged Care in Five-Biomarker-Defined Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection

Watanabe, N.; Watari, T.; Otsuka, Y.; Matsumiya, T.

2026-04-11 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.10.26350004 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFive-biomarker-defined hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) causes invasive infections, but its burden in bloodstream infections versus classical K. pneumoniae (cKp) is unclear. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Japan included K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection episodes from January 2022-December 2024. hvKp was defined by the presence of all 5 genotypic biomarkers (rmpA, rmpA2, iucA, iroB, and peg-344). The primary outcome was abscess complications, and secondary outcomes were length of stay and antibiotic duration. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for 164 isolates. ResultsAmong the 207 episodes, 28 (14%) were of hvKp. Abscess complication occurred in 17 (61%) hvKp versus 23 (13%) cKp episodes (adjusted odds ratio 10.7; 95% CI, 4.36-26.2). Median length of stay in hvKp versus cKp was 28 versus 14 days (adjusted ratio 1.60; 95% CI, 1.18-2.16) and median antibiotic duration was 43 versus 14 days (adjusted ratio 2.13; 95% CI, 1.64-2.77). These associations were attenuated after adjusting for abscess-related complications. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed, although the study was underpowered. Multidrug resistance was less frequent in hvKp strains than in cKp strains (11% vs. 30%; P = .040). Among the sequenced hvKp episodes, abscess rates varied across lineages, from 9 of 10 in ST23 to 1 of 4 in ST412. ConclusionsFive biomarker-defined hvKp strains delineated a bloodstream infection subgroup with frequent abscess complications and prolonged care. hvKp and cKp present distinct clinical challenges; diagnostic tools distinguishing these subgroups may aid abscess evaluation and source control.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
4
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
8
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
14
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
23
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%