Back

Enzymatic Ligation Strategy to Enhance Electrospray Ionization Efficiency and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry of DNA and RNA Oligonucleotides

Sharin, M.; Fitzgerald, N. J.; Kennedy, S. M.; Park, I. G.; Clark, K. D.

2026-04-11 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.09.717506 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful technique for characterizing modified RNA as it directly sequences and quantifies all mass-altering modifications simultaneously. However, the physicochemical properties of RNA result in poor ionization efficiencies during electrospray ionization, presenting a major barrier to sensitive MS measurements necessary for low abundance RNA samples and RNAs with low modification stoichiometries. Here, we report a ligation-based approach to increase ionization efficiencies of RNA oligonucleotides. We show that short ([~]5 nt), chemically modified DNA oligonucleotides can be enzymatically ligated to RNA to serve as MS signal enhancers. Among a series of signal enhancers appended with various alkyl and alkylimidazolium functional groups, we found that decyl-functionalized derivatives improved MS sensitivity by [~]15-fold compared to unlabeled oligonucleotide. When ligated to RNA standards, the decyl-modified signal enhancer increased MS signals 2-4-fold with the additional benefit of improved retention during liquid chromatography (LC) separations without ion pairing agents. To apply the ligation-based approach to RNase T1 digests of longer RNAs, a multi-step enzymatic approach was optimized to maximize ligation efficiencies. We then ligated signal enhancers to a yeast transfer RNA (tRNA) digest and observed increased MS signals for numerous sequence-informative digestion products. Importantly, the sequences of RNA oligonucleotides ligated to signal enhancers were readily determined by tandem mass spectrometry with collision-induced dissociation. This ligation-based strategy for enhancing LC-MS/MS characterization of RNA creates opportunities to measure low abundance RNA samples and their modifications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.6%
2
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
5
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
8
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
16
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
29
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%