Back

An imaging flow cytometry method to study platelet-monocyte aggregates using Long COVID as a model

Thompon, A.; Venter, C.; de Villiers, W. J.; De Swardt, D.; Laubscher, G. J.; Kell, D. B.; Pretorius, E.

2026-04-09 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.09.717442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLong COVID is characterised by persistent systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, with increasing evidence implicating thromboinflammatory mechanisms. Platelet-monocyte aggregates (PMA) represent a sensitive marker of platelet activation and immune-vascular interactions, but their role in Long COVID remains incompletely defined. MethodsThis study quantified circulating PMA in 20 Long COVID patients and 20 healthy controls using a two-colour imaging flow cytometry assay targeting CD14 (a monocyte receptor for pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMPs) and CD62P (P-selectin). PMA were expressed as a percentage of total monocytes, and platelet attachment patterns were classified into single versus multiple platelet binding. Statistical analyses included Shapiro-Wilk normality testing, unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests or two-way ANOVA as appropriate, and linear regression for correlation analysis. ResultsCirculating PMA were significantly elevated in Long COVID patients compared with controls (29.19 [20.02-37.26] vs 4.59 [2.67-7.16], p < 0.0001). Long COVID samples showed a reduced proportion of monocytes with single platelet attachment and a corresponding increase in multiple platelet binding (p < 0.0001). In controls, %PMA increased with age (p < 0.01), whereas no age association was observed in Long COVID, indicating an elevated baseline independent of age. ConclusionsLong COVID is associated with markedly increased platelet-monocyte aggregation and altered platelet attachment dynamics, consistent with sustained thromboinflammatory activity. PMA represent a sensitive cellular marker of platelet-driven immune activation and may have utility as an accessible biomarker for stratifying thromboinflammatory burden in Long COVID.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
23
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%