Back

A correlational study of ABCA3 and SCN4B as exercise-related biomarkers of patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection

Qiao, S.; Chen, T.; Xie, B.; Han, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, Y.; Jia, B.; Wu, N.

2026-04-14 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.09.717394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccumulating evidence indicates that moderate exercise may reduce the incidence of Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD), but the specific mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to identify exercise-related biomarkers in TAAD patients and to investigate their underlying mechanisms. MethodsTranscriptome data related to TAAD and exercise-related genes were obtained from publicly available databases. Candidate biomarkers for TAAD were identified through an integrative approach incorporating differential expression analysis, machine learning, and expression level assessment, leading to the construction of a diagnostic model. Subsequently, functional enrichment, immune infiltration, regulatory network analysis, and computational drug prediction were conducted to systematically investigate the pathological mechanisms and translational potential of the indentified biomarkers. ResultsABCA3 and SCN4B were identified as exercise-related biomarkers in TAAD progression. A nomogram incorporating these two biomarkers exhibited strong diagnostic performance for identifying the disease. Functional enrichment analysis revealed potential involvement of these biomarkers in disease progression through pathways including circadian rhythm regulation and ribosome biosynthesis. Additionally, immune cells like M1 macrophages and naive B cells, as well as regulatory factors including hsa-miR-1343-3p and XIST, were found to be involved in this process. Finally, zonisamide and MRS1097 were identified through computation prediction as potential therapeutic drugs. ConclusionABCA3 and SCN4B were identified as exercise-related biomarkers associatied with TAAD and represent potential valuable targets for both diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
4
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
27
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%