Back

Feasibility of Endothelial Cell Isolation from Routine Coronary Function Testing in ANOCA Patients

de Jong, E. A. M.; Kapteijn, D.; Daniels, M.; Nijkamp, T.; Zalewski, P. D.; Beltrame, J. F.; Damman, P.; Civelek, M.; Benavente, E. D.; van de Hoef, T. P.; Den Ruijter, H. M.

2026-04-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350551 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAngina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is a heterogeneous condition encompassing distinct endotypes representing different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Endothelial dysfunction is considered a central hallmark of ANOCA. However, studying patient-derived endothelial cells (ECs) remains challenging due to the limited availability of disease-specific endothelial samples. We therefore aimed to assess the feasibility of isolating and culturing ECs from catheterization material obtained during routine coronary function testing in ANOCA patients. MethodsCatheterization material was collected from 79 ANOCA patients (84% female, age 58{+/-}10 years) undergoing coronary function testing. ECs were isolated, expanded and characterized using immunostaining, flow cytometry, gene expression profiling and functional assays. ResultsEC isolation was successful in 43% of cases and resulted in 34 primary EC cultures that were expanded up to passage 10. Isolation success was independent of clinical or procedural characteristics. Isolated cells exhibited typical EC morphology and expressed EC markers confirmed by immunostaining, flow cytometry and gene expression analyses. EC marker gene expression remained largely stable over passages. However, stress- and defense-related gene expression programs increased over time, while proliferation-related processes decreased. Functional assays demonstrated that the coronary catheterization-derived ECs showed typical properties of wound healing, angiogenesis, activation responses upon stimuli and monocyte adhesion. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of isolating and expanding ECs directly from catheterization material collected during routine coronary function testing in ANOCA patients. These patient-derived ECs retain characteristic endothelial features and functionality. This approach offers primary EC cultures to study the mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction in ANOCA. Graphic Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=186 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26350551v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (57K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5655d3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cab83org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4055baorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bc3d08_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG PerspectivesO_ST_ABSClinical perspectiveC_ST_ABSWhat is new?O_LIWe established a method to isolate and culture endothelial cells from routine coronary catheterization material in patients with ANOCA, enabling direct study of patient-specific endothelial dysfunction. C_LIO_LIThe patient-derived endothelial cells exhibit characteristic morphology, express canonical endothelial markers and retain functional properties consistent with endothelial physiology. C_LI What are the clinical implications?O_LIThis approach provides a clinically relevant platform to investigate mechanisms underlying ANOCA and may support the development of personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. C_LIO_LIBroader application of this method could facilitate translational research in other vascular pathologies where access to endothelial tissue is limited. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.2%
3
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
10
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
29
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%