Back

Patterns and predictors of antibiotic use among livestock owners in northeast Madagascar

Xiao, M.; Girard, Q.; Pender, M.; Rabezara, J. Y.; Rahary, P.; Randrianarisoa, S.; Rasambainarivo, F.; Rasolofoniaina, O.; Soarimalala, V.; Janko, M. M.; Nunn, C. L.

2026-04-13 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350537 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAntibiotic use (ABU) is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), but ABU patterns are poorly understood in low-income countries where the burden of AMR is great and ABU is insufficiently regulated. Here, we report ABU from ten sites ranging from rural villages to small cities in Madagascar, a country with high AMR levels, and present results from modeling to identify factors that may be associated with ABU in this setting. MethodsWe conducted surveys of 290 individuals from ten sites in the SAVA Region of northeast Madagascar to gather data on sociodemographic characteristics, agricultural and animal husbandry practices, recent antibiotic use, the antibiotics that participants recalled using in their lifetimes, and the sources of their antibiotics. Using these data, we conducted statistical analyses with a mixed-effects logistic model to determine which characteristics were associated with recent antibiotic use. ResultsNearly all respondents (N=283, 97.6%) reported ABU in their lifetimes, with amoxicillin being the most widely reported antibiotic (N=255, 90.1% of those reporting ABU). All recalled antibiotics were classified as frontline drugs except for ciprofloxacin. Most respondents who reported antibiotic use also reported obtaining antibiotics without prescriptions from local stores (N=273, 96.5%), while only 52.3% (N=148) reported obtaining antibiotics through a prescriptive route, such as from a health clinic or private doctor. Of the 127 individuals (44.9%) who reported recent ABU, men were found to be significantly less likely to have recently taken antibiotics than women. ConclusionsOur findings provide new insights into ABU in agricultural settings in low-income countries, which have historically been understudied in AMR and pharmacoepidemiologic research. Knowledge of ABU patterns supports understanding of AMR dynamics and AMR control efforts in these contexts, such as interventions on inappropriate antibiotic dispensing. Key pointsO_LIAntibiotic use (ABU) in Madagascar is largely unstudied despite its role in antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which Madagascar faces a high burden of. C_LIO_LIABU was widespread among livestock owners in northeast Madagascar, with the majority of study participants reporting ABU in their lifetimes and most people reporting ABU also having taken antibiotics in the previous three months. C_LIO_LIMost respondents reported obtaining their antibiotics from non-pharmaceutical stores, indicating high levels of unregulated ABU, though more than half also reported sourcing their antibiotics through prescriptive means (like doctors and health clinics). C_LIO_LIMen were less likely than women to have taken antibiotics in the previous three months. C_LIO_LIThese findings support the development of interventions to mitigate the burden of AMR in Madagascar and similar contexts while underscoring the need for more comprehensive research on the drivers and patterns of ABU. C_LI Plain language summaryIn this study, we provide basic information on antibiotic use (ABU) patterns in Madagascar, a country that experiences high levels of resistance but has been particularly understudied in AMR and pharmacological research. We surveyed 290 farmers with livestock from ten sites across northeast Madagascar about their ABU and found that nearly all study participants (N=283, 97.6%) have used antibiotics in their lifetimes, while a little under half of those who reported ABU also reported using antibiotics in the previous three months (N=127, 44.9%). The most used antibiotic was amoxicillin (N=255, 90.1%). Most people obtained their antibiotics from sources that do not require prescriptions, like general stores, indicating that most ABU is unregulated. Through modeling, we also found that men were less likely than women to have taken antibiotics in the previous three months (OR=0.50, CI 0.30-0.82). These findings help us better understand the dynamics of ABU in low-income countries, which have historically been understudied in AMR and pharmacological research. They also support efforts to mitigate the burden of AMR by revealing ABU dynamics that may contribute to the emergence and spread of AMR, as well as identifying targets for intervention to curb inappropriate ABU.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
4
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%