Preventive care in orthopaedic clinical services - testing the acceptability of an online health risk self-assessment tool using a multi-method design
Davidson, S. R.; Browne, S.; Giles, L.; Gillham, K.; Haskins, R.; Campbell, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundMusculoskeletal conditions, such as back pain and osteoarthritis, are common and disabling disorders. Musculoskeletal conditions are closely related to chronic disease risk factors like smoking/vaping, poor nutrition, alcohol misuse and physical inactivity and impact a persons risk of falling (SNAPF). Preventive care for SNAPF risks is often overlooked. Online delivery of preventive care may increase the provision of this care. We aimed to assess if an online tool for SNAPF risks would be used by and acceptable to patients waiting for an orthopaedic consultation. MethodsWe completed a multi-method study to test an online health risk self-assessment tool. A random sample of 300 people on the orthopaedic outpatient waiting list aged 18-64 years were sent the tool in batches of 20-50. The tool assessed SNAPF risks and provided feedback against national guidelines. After each batch, we completed feedback interviews with participants to assess acceptability and updated the tool. We summarised quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using thematic analysis. ResultsOf the 300 participants sent the tool, 51.3% were female, 8.6% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, with a mean (SD) age of 52.0 years (11.2). There were 170 participants (59.2%) who completed the tool, 117 who did not complete it, and 13 participants who were excluded from analysis because they did not receive the SMS. We conducted 184 feedback interviews, including 125 completers and 59 non-completers. The percentage of participants who felt that SMS was an appropriate way to receive the tool was 84.7% of completers and 50% of non-completers. The two most common reasons for not completing the tool were due to perceived risk (13/59, 22.0%), and the SMS was received at an inconvenient time (11/59, 18.6%). Qualitative data from the feedback interviews captured three enablers: i) design, ii) high importance, and iii) engagement with health service, along with four barriers: i) design, ii) risk, iii) relevance, and iv) engagement with health service. ConclusionOur study found that an online health risk self-assessment tool appears to be an acceptable way to assess chronic disease and falls risk factors for people on an orthopaedic waitlist. Trial registrationNot applicable.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Design of a Clinical Balance Tool for Fall Risk Assessments: A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 94%
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 93%
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.