Back

Assessing the clinical effects of accelerated iTBS across the spectrum of treatment-resistant depression: Clinical outcomes of the PRISM-UTRD trial

Pople, C. B.; Vasileiadi, M.; Zaidi, A.; Silver, D.; Musa, L.; Nyman, A. J.; Baskaran, A.; Lin, F.-H.; Cash, R. F. H.; Zalesky, A.; Mollica, A.; Goubran, M.; Dunlop, K.; Chen, R.; Near, J.; Husain, M. I.; Rabin, J. S.; Blumberger, D. M.; Davidson, B.; Hamani, C.; Giacobbe, P.; Lipsman, N.; Tik, M.; Nestor, S.

2026-04-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350062 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be ineffective in individuals who have previously failed brain stimulation, ketamine and/or multiple lines of therapies. Modern accelerated rTMS protocols using image-guided targets have not been systematically investigated in these individuals. The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of personalized, connectivity-guided, accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) of varying refractoriness. Objective: To assess whether connectivity-guided, accelerated iTBS produces significant reductions in depression severity, and to what extent this benefit extends to ultra treatment-resistant depression (UTRD). Design: This was an open-label feasibility trial of connectivity-guided, accelerated iTBS in patients with TRD. Two distinct groups of participants were recruited from a neurosurgical-psychiatry clinic with UTRD and an interventional psychiatry clinic with TRD. Patients were stratified into a priori treatment-resistance subgroups. Patients received five days of open-label treatment. Outcome measures were collected immediately prior to and after treatment, as well as at 4- and 12-weeks post-treatment. Setting: This trial (NCT05813093) was conducted between November 2023 and July 2025 at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants: Patients with major depressive disorder. A total of 96 participants were screened, with 73 meeting eligibility criteria (UTRD=30, TRD=43). One withdrew due to inability to tolerate the baseline MRI, and the other withdrew voluntarily prior to treatment. Intervention: Participants underwent a neuronavigated accelerated iTBS (600 pulses) protocol using personalized left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) targets derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), comprising eight daily treatments, repeated over five days. Main Outcomes: Primary outcomes were i) change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) from baseline to the end of the fifth day of treatment, and ii) the difference in change in HAM-D17 between UTRD and TRD subgroups. Results: Connectivity-guided fMRI targeting yielded personalized targets clustered around the anterolateral dlPFC. Accelerated iTBS elicited rapid antidepressant effects ({Delta}HAM-D17 -9.01 [SD 6.06], t = -12.45, p < 0.001) regardless of treatment-resistance group ({Delta}HAM-D17 -9.64 [SD 5.94] vs -8.10 [SD 6.12], t = -1.05, p = 0.299), which were sustained up to 12 weeks after treatment. Overall response and remission rates at the end of treatment were 40.8% and 16.9%. Self-report scales revealed broad symptomatic relief outside of core depressive symptoms. Conclusions & Relevance: This study demonstrated that fMRI connectivity-guided, accelerated iTBS induces sustained antidepressant effects and broader psychiatric benefits in patients across the spectrum of TRD. In a cohort unlikely to respond to most antidepressant therapies, connectivity-guided, accelerated iTBS offers a safe, well-tolerated option that can achieve benefit, or when ineffective, allow patients to expeditiously proceed with subsequent therapies than conventional rTMS. Trial Registration: This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with NCT05813093.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.9%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
14
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
15
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
19
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
21
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%