Back

Lipoengineering of Biomolecular Condensates Controls Material Properties and Multiphase Hierarchy to Guide Organoid Morphogenesis

Huang, Z.; Alam, M. M.; Shokri, M.; Savitrinarayana, H. C.; Valappil, S.; Agarwal, T.; Scrutton, R. M.; Maryam, L.; Gulzar, A.; Wang, J.; Tigani, D. J.; Pascoalino, L. A.; Jadhav, A. V.; Adhya, A. L.; Bah, A.; Qin, Z.; Shi, Z.; Blatchley, M. R.; Chen, J.; Knowles, T. P. J.; Mozhdehi, D.

2026-04-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.08.717265 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cells use post-translational modifications (PTMs) to reconfigure biomolecular condensates across length scales, space, and time.1,2 While charged PTMs are well-known electrostatic switches,3,4 how ubiquitous neutral PTMs shape condensate plasticity and hierarchy remains unclear. Here, we establish a set of design principles for using site-specific lipidation, a class of neutral hydrophobic PTMs, to rationally control properties and interactions of engineered biomolecular condensates. Through systematic analysis of over 80 lipidated synthetic intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), we uncovered two distinct axes of control. First, the interplay between the lipid and the local three-residue sequence of its attachment site acts as a programmable switch for cohesion--the homotypic interactions that define the material state of the condensed phase-- directing assemblies toward dynamic liquids, arrested gels, or ordered fibrillar solids. Second, the lipid, together with the global properties of the IDP scaffold, tunes adhesion--the heterotypic interactions that govern condensate miscibility and hierarchical organization. We harnessed these principles to rationally engineer complex, multi-phase architectures and create hybrid hydrogels with programmed microstructure and material properties that guide the morphogenesis of functional intestinal organoids. These findings establish a new framework for lipoengineering advanced biomaterials and provide a blueprint for dissecting structure-property relationships across diverse classes of PTMs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.0%
2
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.9%
4
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.2%
6
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
8
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.8%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.2%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.7%
12
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
16
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
20
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
25
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%