Back

Who Infects Whom? Exploiting Bacterial Minicells for Targeted Virome Enrichment and Phage-Host Interaction Analysis through an Integrated Metagenomic Approach

Pedramfar, A.; Ensenat, E.; Allcock, N. S.; Millard, A. D.; Galyov, E. E.

2026-04-09 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.08.717211 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Linking bacteriophages (phages) to their hosts remains a fundamental challenge to understanding microbial ecology, viral evolution, and horizontal gene transfer. Although phages are the most abundant biological entities on Earth, the majority of them remain uncharacterized due to the lack of efficient host-linking approaches. Traditional methods, such as plaque assays, have significant limitations as they depend on visible lysis and therefore fail to detect phages that do not form plaques. Conversely, shotgun metagenomics can recover viral genomes directly from environmental samples; however, it cannot directly link phages to their bacterial hosts. In this study, we addressed this limitation by tackling the critical question of "who infects whom?" through the development of a novel, culture-independent approach that utilises an anucleate bacterial minicells-based platform to enrich for phages capable of infecting a target bacterial host. To validate our approach, purified Escherichia coli minicells were exposed to a concentrated viral fraction derived from sewage samples. Genomic DNA from phages that successfully infected and interacted with the E. coli minicells was isolated, amplified, and sequenced. Metagenomic analysis revealed a distinct E. coli-specific virome, including several putatively novel phage species and genera. This platform effectively bridges the gap between culture-dependent and metagenomic methods, providing a scalable, host-targeted tool for identifying phage-host pairs. Our approach also opens new opportunities for studying phage-host interaction networks in complex microbial ecosystems and enhances our ability to investigate viral diversity, host specificity, and the ecological roles of phages in natural environments.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
4
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
7
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
10
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
21
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%