Back

Eco-physiological and transcriptomic plasticity of Dianthus inoxianus in response to drought

Parra, A. R.; Balao, F.

2026-04-10 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.08.702570 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phenotypic plasticity is a key mechanism by which plants adjust their traits to environmental changes. These phenotypic adjustments are driven by plastic changes in gene expression regulated by gene regulatory networks. Drought, a major selective force in Mediterranean ecosystems, provides a powerful context to examine how genomic plasticity translates into phenotypic responses. Here, we used Dianthus inoxianus, a drought-tolerant Mediterranean carnation, in order to characterize the phenotypic and transcriptomic plasticity in response to drought stress combining ecophysiological measurements with RNA-seq, gene co-expression and gene regulatory network analyses. Most of the phenotypic traits exhibited low plasticity in response to drought, except water and osmotic potential. At transcriptome level, we identified 57 plastic genes, suggesting that drought tolerance in D. inoxianus relies predominantly on constitutive gene expression. These plastic genes were enriched in processes typically related to drought response, such as cell wall components and abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. Some plastic genes belonged to drought-responsive modules, while others were hubs in different modules acting as inter-modular connectors. Furthermore, the regulatory network revealed that these plastic genes were strongly regulated by multiple stress-responsive transcription factors, and that drought-associated modules were regulated through both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. In addition, we identified contrasting patterns of canalization and decanalization, with immune and post-transcriptional regulation remaining canalized under drought, whereas photosynthesis and amino acid metabolism became decanalized, potentially releasing cryptic genetic variation. Overall, our results emphasise that drought tolerance in D. inoxianus emerges from a strategy combining preadaptation with targeted plasticity in key molecular pathways.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.5%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
11
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
25
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
27
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%