Resilience and its determinants among adolescents and young adults with perinatally acquired HIV enrolled in a peer-led mentorship program in India

BackgroundAdolescents and young adults with perinatally acquired HIV (APHIV) face complex psychosocial and structural challenges that may undermine resilience, a modifiable psychosocial determinant of treatment engagement, and health outcomes. Evidence on peer-led interventions targeting resilience among APHIV in South Asia remains limited. We evaluated resilience and its correlates among participants in the ImPossible Fellowship, a peer-led mentorship intervention in India. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of 216 APHIV following completion of the 24-month ImPossible Fellowship in southern India in 2024. Surveys administered by trained youth investigators assessed sociodemographic, educational, and clinical characteristics. Resilience was measured using the Child and Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (CYRM-R), a validated multidimensional tool capturing personal and relational resilience dimensions. Low resilience was defined as CYRM-R threshold score [≤]33rd percentile. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent correlates of low resilience, and sensitivity analyses explored alternative CYRM-R thresholds. ResultsParticipants had a mean age of 18.7 years (range 9-24); 50% had no surviving parents, and 43% lived in child care institutions. Median resilience scores were high (74, Interquartile range [IQR] 69-78), and 91% achieved viral suppression. In multivariate analyses, three factors were independently associated with low resilience: loss of both parents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.35, 95% CI 2.09-9.06), school discontinuation (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.10-5.34), and self-reported communication barriers at HIV clinics (aOR 5.83, 95% CI 2.69-12.64). These associations were consistent across sensitivity analyses at alternative resilience thresholds. At the most stringent threshold of low resilience (CYRM-R score [≤]15th percentile), unsuppressed viral load also emerged as a significant correlate, suggesting that treatment failure may be concentrated among those with the most severely compromised resilience. ConclusionsAPHIV participating in a peer-led mentorship program demonstrated high overall resilience and viral suppression, but also revealed addressable vulnerabilities mapping to specific programmatic priorities. Peer-led models offer a promising foundational platform; however, complementary structural and psychosocial enhancements targeting these modifiable determinants are essential to optimize outcomes for those facing the greatest cumulative adversity.