Back

Informing Epidemic Control Strategies: A Spatial Metapopulation Model Incorporating Recurrent Mobility, Clustering, and Group-Structured Interactions

Smah, M. L.; Seale, A.; Rock, K.

2026-04-11 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350398 medRxiv
Show abstract

Infectious disease dynamics are strongly shaped by human mobility, social structure, and heterogeneous contact patterns, yet many epidemic models do not jointly capture these features. This study develops a spatial metapopulation epidemic model incorporating recurrent group-switch interactions to represent real-world transmission processes. Building on the Movement-Interaction-Return framework, the model integrates household structure, age-stratified contacts, and mobility between locations within a single SEIR framework. Using UK demographic, mobility, and social contact data, the model quantifies how within- and between-group interactions, mobility rates, and location connectivity influence epidemic spread. Both deterministic and stochastic simulations are implemented to analyse outbreak dynamics, variability, and fade-out probabilities for COVID-19-like and Ebola-like infections. Results shows that highly connected locations drive faster transmission, earlier epidemic peaks, and greater difficulty in containment, whereas larger but less connected locations tend to produce slower, more localised outbreaks despite their population size. Comparative analysis reveals that COVID-19-like infections spread rapidly and remain difficult to control even under interventions, while Ebola-like infections exhibit slower dynamics and are more effectively contained, particularly under targeted measures. Non-pharmaceutical interventions, particularly widespread closures, substantially reduce infections, hospitalisations, and deaths, although effectiveness depends on timing and pathogen characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of integrating mobility, clustering, and demographic heterogeneity to inform targeted and effective epidemic control strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
5
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
6
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%