Back

A Multi-Clique Network Model for Epidemic Spread with Fully Accessible Within-Group and Limited Between-Group Contacts

Smah, M. L.; Seale, A. C.; Rock, K. S.

2026-04-11 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350390 medRxiv
Show abstract

Network-based epidemic models have been instrumental in understanding how contact structure shapes infectious disease dynamics, yet widely used frameworks such as Erd[o]s-Renyi, configuration-model, and stochastic block networks do not explicitly capture the combination of fully accessible (saturated) within-group interactions and constrained between-group connectivity characteristic of many real-world settings. Here, we introduce the Multi-Clique (MC) network model, a generative framework in which individuals are organised into fully connected cliques representing stable contact groups (e.g., households, classrooms, or workplaces), with a limited number of external connections governing inter-group transmission. Using stochastic susceptible-infectious-recovered (SIR) simulations on degree-matched networks, we compare epidemic dynamics on MC networks with those on classical random graph models. Despite having an identical mean degree, MC networks exhibit systematically distinct behaviour, including slower epidemic growth, reduced peak prevalence, increased fade-out probability, and delayed time to peak. These effects arise from rapid within but constrained between clique transmission, creating structural bottlenecks that standard models do not capture. The MC framework provides an interpretable, data-driven representation of recurrent contact structure, with parameters that map directly to observable quantities such as household and classroom sizes. By isolating the role of intergroup connectivity, the model offers a basis for evaluating targeted intervention strategies that reduce between-group mixing while preserving within-group interactions. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly representing the real-life clique-based network structure in epidemic models and suggest that classical degree-matched networks may systematically overestimate epidemic speed and intensity in structured populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
7
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
22
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
23
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%