Changes in health inequalities following a major urban greenway intervention: Evidence from a 15-year natural experiment in the UK
Nguyen, D.; ONeill, C.; Akaraci, S.; Tate, C.; Wang, R.; Garcia, L.; Kee, F.; Hunter, R. F.
Show abstract
HighlightsO_LIHealth inequalities have widened over 15 years, favouring high-income groups C_LIO_LIInequality in physical activity & mental health widened the most pre-intervention C_LIO_LIPost-intervention, inequalities persisted but stayed relatively unchanged. C_LIO_LILong-term illness and unemployment were key drivers of inequality C_LIO_LIThe greenway may have slowed down the inequality widening but the impact is limited C_LI BackgroundEvidence concerning health inequalities following urban green and blue space UGBS) interventions is limited. This study examined the changes in health inequalities after a major urban regeneration project, the Connswater Community Greenway (CCG), in Belfast, UK. MethodCross-sectional household surveys were conducted in 2010/11 (baseline), 2017/18 (immediately after completion), and 2023/24 (long-term follow-up) with a sample of approximately 1,000 adults each wave. Using concentration indices (CI), income-related health inequalities for three outcomes (physical activity, mental wellbeing and quality of life) were measured. A regression-based decomposition of concentration index examined the contribution of sociodemographic factors to the observed inequalities underpinning each outcome over time. ResultsAcross three waves, there was widening of inequalities over the 15-year period across all three health outcomes, with those from high-income groups reported higher levels of physical activity (CI=0.33, SE=0.026), better mental wellbeing (CI=0.03, SE=0.003), and better quality of life (CI=0.09, SE=0.008). The widening inequalities mainly occurred during the construction phase of CCG (2010-2017) and remained stable post-intervention (2017-2023). Decomposition analysis revealed that the pro-poor concentration of long-term illness and unemployment was the key driver that together explained approximately 51%-76% of the inequalities. ConclusionThe CCG was limited in reducing health inequalities which were mainly driven by long-term illness and unemployment - factors beyond the direct scope of the UGBS intervention - resulting in low-income groups likely to fall further behind the wealthier groups. The widening of inequality is consistent with findings from other public interventions that did not have a primary equity focus.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.