Back

Predictive Modelling to Differentiate Bacterial and Viral cases of Childhood Pneumonia in Kilifi, Kenya using Protein Markers and Clinical Data

Matuli, C.; Waeni, J. M.; Gicheru, E. T.; Sande, C. J.; Gallagher, K.

2026-04-13 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350312 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTo date, accessible diagnostic tools to identify whether a patients pneumonia is a bacterial, or viral infection, are not accurate or timely enough to prevent preemptive antibiotic administration. Relying on single biomarkers or clinical presentations has been insufficient. We aimed to incorporate a wide range of novel biomarkers and clinical presentations in a multivariable model and validate its capacity to differentiate cases of bacterial and viral pneumonia. MethodsData from 457 children aged 2-59 months, admitted to Kilifi County Referral Hospital, Kenya, with bacterial (n = 229) and viral (n = 228) infections, were used to develop and validate a predictive multivariable Poisson regression model to differentiate pneumonia etiology. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to assess biomarker performance and validate the model internally. ResultsSixty-three percent (63%) of the children presented with severe pneumonia. 72% with viral pneumonia had severe pneumonia, compared to 54% with bacterial pneumonia who had severe pneumonia. In crude analyses, chest-wall indrawing, cough, convulsions, crackles, angiotensinogen, and Serpin Family A Member 1 were significantly associated with pneumonia etiology, controlling for age. However, only chest-wall indrawing remained significant in multivariable analyses after controlling for age. The model demonstrated fair, but inadequate, discrimination, with an Area Under the Curve of 0.61. ConclusionAmong the children admitted to hospital with WHO defined pneumonia, a wide range of biomarkers and clinical presentations still failed to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.