Back

Validation of Immunoscore for Prognostic Stratification in HPV-associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: An International Multicenter Study

Nguyen, D. H.; Majdi, A.; Marliot, F.; Houtart, V.; Kirilovsky, A.; Hijazi, A.; Fredriksen, T.; de Sousa Carvalho, N.; Bach, A.- S.; Gaultier, A.- L.; Fabiano, E.; Kreps, S.; Tartour, E.; Pere, H.; Veyer, D.; Blanchard, P.; Angell, H. K.; Pages, F.; Mirghani, H.; Galon, J.

2026-04-11 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350238 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTreatment optimization in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) remains challenging, as recent de-escalation trials have shown limited success. Current patient selection strategies based on smoking history and TNM classification are insufficient, highlighting the need for robust, standardized prognostic biomarkers. We report the first validation of the Immunoscore (IS) for prognostic stratification in HPV-associated OPSCC. Patients and methodsWe analyzed 191 HPV-associated (p16+ and HPV DNA/RNA+) OPSCC patients from an international multicenter cohort (2015-2024), comprising a French monocentric retrospective training cohort (N = 48) and three validation cohorts: French monocentric retrospective (N = 48), French multicenter prospective (N = 50), and US multicenter retrospective (N = 45). IS is a standardized digital pathology assay quantifying CD3lJ and CD8lJ densities in tumor cores and invasive margins, with cut-offs defined in the training cohort and validated across cohorts. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, alongside 3RNA-seq and sequential immunofluorescence profiling of immune composition. ResultsMedian age 65; 80% male; 74% smokers; 66% T1-2; 82% N0-1 (AJCC8th). IS-High patients demonstrated superior 3-year DFS in the training and validation cohorts 1-3 (all log-rank P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified IS-Low as the strongest independent risk factor for DFS (HR 9.03; 95% CI: 4.02-20.31; P < 0.001). The model combining IS with clinical factors showed higher predictive accuracy for DFS (C-index 0.82) than clinical variables alone (0.7; P < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed for TTR and OS. IS-High tumors showed markedly higher enrichment of lymphoid and myeloid immune cell populations, contrasting with immune-poor signatures in IS-Low tumors. ConclusionsIS is a robust biomarker that outperforms standard clinical variables in both prognostic and predictive accuracy. The enriched cytotoxic immune infiltrate in IS-High tumors explains favorable outcomes and supports their suitability for treatment de-escalation. Prospective validation is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
14
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
15
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
17
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
20
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%