Back

Frequency of bacterial STI testing amongst people accessing sexual health services in England, 2024: a cross-sectional analysis of national surveillance data

Baldry, G.; Harb, A.-K.; Findlater, L.; Ogaz, D.; Migchelsen, S. J.; Fifer, H.; Saunders, J.; Mohammed, H.; Sinka, K.

2026-04-13 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.08.26349546 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesWe determined the frequency of sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing among people accessing sexual health services (SHS) in England. MethodsWe assessed STI testing frequency in face-to-face and online SHSs in England using data from the GUMCAD STI surveillance system. We quantified different combinations of tests (e.g. single chlamydia test or full STI screen), number of tests completed in 2024 and test positivity by sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics, as well as clinical setting and outcomes. ResultsOverall, there were 2,222,028 attendances at SHS in England in 2024 that involved tests for chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and/or HIV. Most of these attendances involved tests for all four of these STIs. Most people accessing SHS in England tested once (80.1%), and a small minority (1.9%) tested at least quarterly (4+ times). Some groups had a comparably larger proportion of quarterly testers; these included gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) (6.7%), London residents (3.6%), online testers (2.5%), people using HIV-PrEP (13%), and people with 5+ partners in the previous 3 months (10.6%). Only 10.5% of GBMSM reporting higher-risk sexual behaviours tested quarterly despite recommendations for quarterly testing in this group. ConclusionsThe majority of those who tested for STIs in England in 2024 only tested once. The minority who tested at least quarterly had a higher proportion of GBMSM, people using HIV-PrEP, London residents and people reporting higher risk behaviours. Quarterly testing often appears to be aligned with current testing recommendations in England; however, we also observed that only a low proportion of behaviourally high-risk GBMSM and HIV-PrEP users are meeting these recommendations. It is important to acknowledge groups with lower or higher testing frequency when developing interventions and updating guidelines related to STI testing. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICThe effectiveness of asymptomatic testing for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and the potential impact of the consequent increased antibiotic use on rising antimicrobial resistance and individual harm has recently been questioned. Testing and treatment remains a key pillar of STI prevention and management; despite this, there is limited evidence of STI testing frequency within sexual services (SHS) on a national level. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSThis analysis shows that the majority of people attending SHSs in England in 2024 tested once, and only a small proportion of behaviourally high-risk people tested frequently. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYAwareness of groups that are behaviourally high risk but testing infrequently is important to guide interventions and messaging regarding STI testing. The low levels of frequent testing, even among those who would be recommended quarterly testing under UK guidelines, provides important context for wider discussion around asymptomatic STI screening.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.5%
50% of probability mass above
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
7
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
11
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%