Moving Beyond Duty Hours: Understanding the Contributors to Internal Medicine Resident Workload and Experience
Bianchina, N.; Fischer, C.; Rai, K.; Clawson, J.; McBeth, L.; Gottenborg, E.; Keniston, A.; Burden, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundHigh workload among healthcare workers has increasingly been correlated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient operational and financial outcomes, and burnout. Despite growing literature exploring causes of attending physician workload, there is limited understanding of trainee-specific measures. ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize elements contributing to trainee workload and perceived challenges and satisfiers to the trainee workday as a foundation for better understanding and measuring trainee work experience. MethodsInternal Medicine and Medicine-Pediatrics residents at an academic medical center were invited to participate in focus groups discussing contributors to inpatient workload and work experience between March and April 2024. A qualitative content analysis identified key metrics of trainee workload and work experience, which were then consolidated into overarching domains. A structured, multi-round rating process ranked the perceived relevance of each metric. ResultsTwenty residents participated across six focus groups. Analysis of focus groups yielded 297 workload metrics across 28 unique domains. Seventeen domains had metrics identified as highly relevant (median 6-7; IQR < 1) including autonomy, communication, disruptions, task switching, documentation, emotional burden, patient factors, professional fulfillment, rounding, teaming, and work-life balance. ConclusionsResident physicians highlighted complex interactions between clinical factors, work design, and psychosocial dynamics that contribute to their sense of workload. This creates opportunities to develop unique measures of workload to understand the trainee experience better. Further studies are needed to capture the generalizability of these findings and the relationship between these workload domains and patient, organizational, and trainee outcomes with the aim of implementing evidence-based work design.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 93%
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 92%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 92%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Advanced Respiratory Care Educational Training Program for Healthcare Workers in Lesotho: An Observational Study 94%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual Recruitment is Here to Stay: 2020 ID Fellowship Program and Matched Applicant Recruitment Experiences 95%
- Characterization of prolonged COVID-19 symptoms and patient comorbidities in an outpatient telemedicine cohort 90%
- When should healthcare workers with COVID-19 return to work? An analysis of follow-up antigen test results after a positive COVID test 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.