Back

Convergently-evolved honeypot ants show mixed signs of niche conservatism

Nogueira, B. R.; Leon-Alvarado, O. D.; Khadempour, L.

2026-04-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.07.717096 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Honeypot ants represent an example of convergent evolution, where a group of workers specialized in storing liquid food in their crops (i.e., stomach) has independently evolved multiple times across different ant genera. While seasonal resource scarcity and arid conditions are thought to drive the evolution of repletism, the role of environmental variables in this process has not been tested. With this is mind, species ensemble models were computed to assess suitability and richness areas, and the importance of predictors. Predictor importance was compared between genera and groups occupying a similar geographical area. Niche overlap and similarity between honeypot ant species were also evaluated to determine whether they occupy similar environmental spaces. Similarity was mainly found within genera, and Leptomyrmex and Myrmecocystus showed striking niche differences. Overall, Leptomyrmex distribution was mainly influenced by atmospheric bioclimatic variables like precipitation and temperature, while Myrmecocystus had soil bioclimatic variables as the most important predictors for their current distribution. Our results indicate that honeypot ants species currently do not occupy the same environmental space, and are not experiencing the same contemporary environmental stressors. While our results suggest that contemporary environmental factors cannot explain the convergence of honeypot ants, future research will examine past climatic conditions along with investigations into the ant genomes to understand more about the causes and consequences of the convergence.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
3
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
5
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
7
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
18
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
27
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.6%
30
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%