Back

Investigating a Relation between Amyloid Beta Plaque Burden and Accumulated Neurotoxicity Caused by Amyloid Beta Oligomers

Kuznetsov, A. V.

2026-04-10 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.07.717091 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}), yet the specific link between plaque burden and cognitive decline remains a subject of intense investigation. This paper presents a mathematical model that simulates the coupled dynamics of A{beta} monomers, soluble oligomers, and fibrillar species in the brain tissue. By modifying existing moment equations to include a dedicated conservation equation for A{beta} monomers, the model explores how various microscopic processes, such as primary nucleation, surface-catalyzed secondary nucleation, fibril elongation, and fragmentation, contribute to macroscopic disease progression. Central to this study is the concept of "accumulated neurotoxicity" as a surrogate marker of biological age, defined as the time-integrated concentration of soluble A{beta} oligomers. Unlike plaque burden, accumulated neurotoxicity cannot be reversed, and the harm it causes depends critically on the sequence of events that produced it. Numerical results demonstrate that while plaque burden and neurotoxicity both increase over time, their relationship is non-linear and highly sensitive to the efficiency of protein degradation machinery. Specifically, impaired degradation leads to a rapid advancement of biological age relative to calendar age. The model further identifies oligomer dissociation and fibril fragmentation as potential protective mechanisms that can counterintuitively reduce neurotoxic burden by diverting monomers away from the soluble oligomer pool. These findings provide a quantitative framework for understanding why individuals with similar plaque burdens may experience vastly different cognitive outcomes, underscoring the importance of targeting soluble oligomers early in therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
6
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
19
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%