Back

Early-life adversity and markers of vulnerability to enduring pain in youth: a multimodal neuroimaging study of the ABCD cohort

Quide, Y.; Lim, T. E.; Gustin, S. M.

2026-04-11 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350367 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly-life adversity (ELA) is a risk factor for enduring pain in youth and is associated with alterations in brain morphology and function. However, it remains unclear whether ELA-related neurobiological changes contribute to the development of enduring pain in early adolescence. MethodsUsing data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we examined multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers in children assessed at baseline (ages 9-11 years) and at 2-year follow-up (ages 11-13 years). ELA exposure was defined at baseline to maximise temporal separation between early adversity and later enduring pain. Participants with enduring pain at follow-up (n = 322) were compared to matched pain-free controls (n = 644). Structural MRI, diffusion MRI (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity), and resting-state functional connectivity data were analysed. Linear models tested main effects of enduring pain, ELA, and their interaction on brain metrics, controlling for relevant covariates. ResultsELA exposure was associated with smaller caudate and nucleus accumbens volumes, and reduced surface area of the left rostral middle frontal gyrus. No significant effects of enduring pain or ELA-by-enduring pain interaction were observed across grey matter, white matter, or functional connectivity measures. ConclusionsELA was associated with alterations in fronto-striatal regions in late childhood, but these changes were not linked to enduring pain in early adolescence. These findings suggest that ELA-related neurobiological alterations may represent early markers of vulnerability rather than concurrent correlates of enduring pain. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine whether these alterations contribute to later chronic pain risk.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.