Back

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Identification of Age- and Treatment-Specific TP53 and PI3K Alterations in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Diaz, F. C.; Waldrup, B.; Carranza, F. G.; Manjarrez, S.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.

2026-04-11 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350355 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite extensive characterization of key oncogenic drivers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to exhibit profound molecular heterogeneity and inconsistent responses to standard therapies, including gemcitabine. The role of pathway-level alterations, particularly in the context of age at onset and therapeutic exposure, remains insufficiently defined. MethodsIn this study, we leveraged a conversational artificial intelligence framework (AI-HOPE-TP53 and AI-HOPE-PI3K) to enable precision oncology, driven interrogation of clinical and genomic data from 184 PDAC tumors, stratified by age at diagnosis and gemcitabine exposure. Using AI-enabled cohort construction and pathway-centric analyses, we evaluated alterations in TP53 and PI3K signaling networks, with findings validated through conventional statistical methods. ResultsTP53 pathway analysis revealed a significantly higher frequency of TP53 mutations in early-onset compared to late-onset PDAC among gemcitabine-treated patients (86.7% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.04), with a similar trend observed between treated and untreated early-onset cases (86.7% vs. 40%, p = 0.07). Notably, in late-onset PDAC patients not treated with gemcitabine, absence of TP53 pathway alterations was associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.011). Complementary analyses of the PI3K pathway demonstrated a higher prevalence of pathway alterations in late-onset gemcitabine-treated tumors compared to untreated counterparts (13.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.02). Importantly, among late-onset patients not receiving gemcitabine, those without PI3K pathway alterations exhibited significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.0001). ConclusionTogether, these findings identify distinct TP53 and PI3K pathway dependencies that are modulated by both age-of-onset and treatment exposure in PDAC. This work highlights the utility of conversational artificial intelligence in enabling rapid, integrative, and hypothesis-generating analyses within a precision oncology framework, supporting the identification of clinically relevant molecular stratification strategies for this aggressive disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%