Back

Characteristics and Correlates of Older Smokers Experiences with E-Cigarette-Related Content on Social Media: Findings from a U.S.-Based Survey

Dycus, R.

2026-04-11 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350354 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite their potential to serve as a reduced-harm alternative to combustible tobacco, e-cigarette take-up remains low among older (45+) adult smokers, especially in the U.S. While social media is a known driver of vaping attitudes and behaviors in younger populations, its influence on older smokers is poorly understood. This paper provides the first focused analysis of e-cigarette-related social media exposure in this population, documenting its prevalence, characteristics, and attitudinal correlates. MethodsData come from an opt-in survey of U.S. adults (N = 974) recruited via Prolific, comprising three groups: (i) non-vaping smokers aged 45+ (N = 484), (ii) former-smoking vapers aged 45+ (N = 149), and (iii) any-vaping-status smokers aged 18-35 (N = 341). Descriptive statistics, weighted to U.S. population benchmarks, characterize self-reported exposure to e-cigarette-related content on social media. Logistic regressions estimate associations between exposure and intentions for future e-cigarette use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, and related attitudes. ResultsOlder smokers (35.3%) reported exposure to e-cigarette-related content on social media less frequently than both older vapers (44.0%) and younger smokers (72.0%). For older smokers, e-cigarette health risks were the most frequently reported topic of content viewed, followed by youth vaping and e-cigarette addiction. Among this group, exposure was positively associated with stated intentions for future e-cigarette use. Exposure was not significantly associated with perceived e-cigarette harms for any group. ConclusionsFindings provide suggestive evidence that social media exposure may promote e-cigarette adoption among older smokers. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the observed associations may reflect selection bias or reverse causality. If a causal relationship exists, the patterns observed suggest that exposure influences e-cigarette adoption through mechanisms other than updating beliefs about e-cigarette risks. While these results tentatively support the potential of social media as a channel for older-smoker harm reduction, any policy applications must carefully weigh privacy concerns and risks to youth. Rigorous experimental studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify how social media might be leveraged to improve public health outcomes among older smokers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
20
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%