Advance Care Planning Documentation Completeness and End-of-Life Care: Trends and Associations Among U.S. Older Adults
Xie, Z.; Jacobs, M. M.; Liang, J.; Patel, B.; Hong, Y.-R.
Show abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) documentation, including living wills and durable power of attorney (DPOA), is intended to support goal concordant end of life care. However, it is unknown if comprehensive documentation confers additional benefits, and how these associations vary across clinical contexts. Methods: We used 2010 to 2022 Health and Retirement Study exit interview data to examine associations between ACP documentation and end of life care among U.S. adults aged 50 years and older. Documentation was categorized as none, one document (living will or DPOA), or two documents (both). Outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) use, life sustaining treatment, hospice enrollment, and out-of-hospital death. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs), and temporal trends in documentation were assessed using joinpoint regression. Results: Among 5,622 decedents representing 23.2 million individuals, 42.7% had two documents and 28.9% had none, documentation increased substantially around 2014. Compared with no documentation, having any documentation was associated with lower likelihood of life-sustaining treatment (aRR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98) and higher likelihood of hospice enrollment (aRR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.60) and out-of-hospital death (aRR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.18), but not ICU use. Having two documents showed similar patterns, with modest differences compared with one document after adjustment. Associations were stronger among decedents with expected death and attenuated among those with unexpected death. Conclusions: Comprehensive ACP documentation is associated with less aggressive end of life care and greater hospice use, though the incremental benefits of two documents are modest. Findings highlight the importance of documentation within care planning processes and the clinical context.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregivers’ burden of care during emergency department care transitions among older adults: a mixed methods cohort study 92%
- Correlation of long-term care facility vaccination practices between seasons and resident types 91%
- Do Assisted Living Facilities That Offer a Dementia Care Program Differ from Those That Do Not? A Population-Level Cross-Sectional Study in Ontario, Canada 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 94%
- Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas 92%
- Comparison of Care Utilization and Medical Institutional Death among Older Adults by Home Care Facility Type: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Fukuoka, Japan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale validation of the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination 88%
- Analyses of academician cohorts generate biased pandemic excess death estimates 87%
- Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review and critical appraisal 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.