Three-dimensional topography of Descemet's membrane in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy using laser scanning confocal microscopy and white-light interferometry
Maurin, C.; Poinard, S.; Travers, G.; Gontier, E.; Karpathiou, G.; Decoeur, F.; He, Z.; Gain, P.; THURET, G.; French Fuchs Study Group,
Show abstract
Aim: To evaluate the potential of a three-dimensional microscope combining Laser scanning confocal imaging and white-light interferometry for quantitative topographic characterisation of Descemet's membrane (DM) in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Methods: Descemet's membranes were collected from 38 FECD patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty and 4 healthy donors. After flat-mounting on glass slide and drying, specimens were analysed using the VK-X3000 system (KEYENCE). Entire samples were reconstructed by image stitching at low magnification (x10) in white-light interferometry mode (0.01nm axial resolution). Higher magnifications (x20-x150) in confocal mode (12nm axial resolution) enabled detailed structural analysis. Three-dimensional height maps were generated to calculate standardised surface roughness parameters. Guttae and other DM features were classified according to spatial organisation and elevation profiles. Results: White-light interferometry enabled full-field mapping of whole 8mm diameter DMs with nanometric vertical resolution (~2 hours/sample). Surface roughness (Sa) was higher in FECD than in controls (median{+/-}IQR: 0.571{+/-}0.259 m vs 0.239{+/-}0.161 m ; p = 0.0018). In FECD, three zones were identified: central (guttae buried in the posterior fibrillar layer; Sa 0.442 {+/-} 0.112 m), paracentral (large uncovered guttae; Sa 0.562{+/-}0.170 m ; p = 0.0423), and outer zone (no confluent guttae; Sa 0.261{+/-}0.143 m ; p < 0.0001). Confocal 3D imaging revealed radial striae, embossments and furrows in the DM, confluent central guttae, and fused or buried structures. Conclusions: Combining white-light interferometry and confocal microscopy enables label-free, high-resolution surface characterisation of DM in FECD, providing quantitative metrics to compare histological subtypes and supporting the predominance of radial structural organisation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.