Back

An integrative study of risk assessment, mediation analysis, and causal inference for the relationship between metabolic syndrome and dilated cardiomyopathy

Qi, J.; Zeng, P.

2026-04-07 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350282 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aims: Although metabolic dysregulation is implicated in DCM, the involvement of metabolic syndrome (MetS) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically examine MetS in DCM pathogenesis. Materials and methods: By leveraging 378,837 UK Biobank participants, instead of the conventional binary MetS, we calculated a continuous metabolic risk score (MRS) and evaluated its influence on DCM risk within a multi-model evidence framework. Bidirectional weighted quantile sum regression identified key MRS components, a nested case-control study assessed 14-year pre-diagnosis MRS trajectories, mediation analyses evaluated MRS mediating lifestyle-DCM links and inflammation mediating MRS-DCM relationships, and Mendelian randomization (MR) evaluated causality for genetically predicted MetS and components on DCM. Results: During a median follow-up period of 13.4 years (interquartile range 12.7~14.1 years), 820 (0.2%) participants developed DCM. Higher MRS (HR=1.26 [1.18~1.34]) was associated with increased DCM risk, and such an association persisted across all robustness assessments even among non-MetS individuals. Waist circumference (WC, HR=1.36 [1.28~1.45], weight=0.58) and glycated hemoglobin (HR=1.23 [1.16~1.30], weight=0.22) dominated MRS' risk contribution. The trajectories of MRS diverged in cases approximately 10 years pre-diagnosis. MRS mediated 5.1~26.2% of lifestyle-related DCM risk, while inflammation mediated 16.4% of the MRS-DCM association. MR analysis further confirmed causal effects of MetS (OR=1.65 [1.45~1.88]), WC (OR=1.79 [1.58~2.03]) on DCM risk. Conclusions: Metabolic dysfunction, which was dominated by central adiposity and hyperglycemia, plays a key role in the occurrence of DCM. Early intervention targeting metabolic factors may prevent DCM onset.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.