Back

Quantifying PD1 saturation by PDL1 in tumor tissue using a novel RNA aptamer-based assay

Veeramani, S.; Yin, C.; Yu, N.; Coleman, K. L.; Smith, B. J.; Weiner, G. J.

2026-04-08 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.06.716702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTherapeutic agents targeting the PD1-PDL1 interaction are of great clinical value, however accurately predicting which patients are most likely to benefit is challenging. Improved predictive biomarkers for anti-PD1 therapy are clearly needed. Quantifying PD1 saturation by PDL1 in tumor tissue has the potential to serve as such a biomarker. Here we report a novel bioassay called the PD1 Ligand Receptor Complex Aptamer (LIRECAP) assay and demonstrate it can be used to quantify the saturation of PD1 by PDL1 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor biospecimens. ResultsThe PD1 LIRECAP assay was developed by identifying a pair of RNA aptamers. One aptamer preferentially binds to unoccupied PD1 (P aptamer) and the other to the PD1-PDL1 complex (C aptamer). P and C aptamers were added together to a formalin-fixed sample, and bound aptamer extracted. A 2-color qRT-PCR assay using a single set of primers was used to determine the ratio of the sample-bound C to P aptamers (C:P ratio) which reflected PD1 saturation by PDL1 in the sample. Quantification of PD1 saturation by PDL1 as determined by the PD1 LIRECAP assay correlated closely with PD1-mediated signaling and PD1-PDL1 proximity. Analysis of sarcoma FFPE biospecimens confirmed the assay is technically reproducible on clinical biospecimens. There were significant differences in PD1 saturation by PDL1 between patients as well as considerable intratumoral heterogeneity. ConclusionsThe PD1 LIRECAP assay is novel assay that can be used to quantify PD1 saturation by PDL1 in clinical biospecimens. The assay is technically feasible, reproducible, and has the potential to serve as a superior predictive biomarker for PD1/PDL1-based therapy. Similar assays based on this platform could be used in other systems and settings to quantify interaction between two molecules.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.9%
3
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
6
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
8
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
10
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%