Back

Disrupted Coupling of Heart Rate Dependent Brain Network Switching and Attentional Task Performance in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

Kundert-Obando, K.; Kittleson, A.; Wang, S.; Pourmotabbed, H.; Provancher, E.; Machado, A.; Park, S.; Sheffield, J. M.; Ward, H. B.

2026-04-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.06.26350241 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia, yet their neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Network switching, a measure of how frequently brain networks change their interactions over time, has been linked to cognitive performance in healthy individuals and has been reported to be altered in schizophrenia. Recent evidence further suggests that the relationship between network switching and cognition depends on arousal, which is itself disrupted in schizophrenia. However, whether arousal-related alterations in network switching contribute to cognitive impairment in schizophrenia remains unclear. Here, we used concurrent resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) and pulse oximetry data from 39 healthy controls (HC), 27 psychiatric controls (PC), and 39 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) to examine whether network switching relates to indices of autonomic arousal. Additionally, in HC and SSD participants, we tested whether arousal moderated the association between network switching and performance on an attention task. We observed no group differences in autonomic arousal. However, PC exhibited higher dorsal default mode and anterior salience network switching rates compared to SSD participants. Additionally, autonomic arousal significantly moderated the relationship between network switching and cognitive performance in HC, an effect that was absent in SSD. Notably, these findings implicate network switching as a potential neural biomarker that differentiates PC from SSD. They also suggest that disrupted coupling between arousal state and network switching, rather than switching alone, may underlie cognitive dysfunction in SSD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.