Back

Network-Level Associations in Nonlinear Brain Dynamics Predict Transcendent Thinking in a Diverse Adolescent Sample

Ghaderi, A. H.; Yang, X.; Immordino-Yang, M. H.

2026-04-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.05.716550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcendent thinking (TT) is an enduring affective and cognitive process characterized by abstract meaning-making, moral reflection, self-referential integration, and strong emotional engagement. Despite growing interest in its developmental and affective significance, the intrinsic neural dynamics that predict individual differences in disposition to TT remain poorly understood. Most prior work has relied on linear functional connectivity measures, which may be insufficient to capture the nonlinear and multiscale nature of brain dynamics underlying higher-order affective dispositions like TT. Here, we introduce a nonlinear functional brain network (FBN) framework based on multiscale entropy (MSE) to investigate whether intrinsic resting-state nonlinear brain dynamics predict disposition to TT in adolescents. Functional connectivity was defined as inter-regional similarity in MSE profiles derived from resting-state fMRI, yielding weighted networks that capture scale-dependent dynamical correspondence rather than linear synchrony. Graph-theoretical, spectral, and information-theoretic measures were computed and evaluated against signal-level and network-level null models. Predictive performance was assessed using machine-learning models and compared with conventional time series-based FBNs. Global intelligence (IQ) was examined as a control cognitive variable. MSE-based network features, particularly spectral energy and Shannon entropy, showed significant associations with TT and enabled reliable prediction of individual differences, whereas time series-based network measures failed to predict TT. No network measures reliably predicted IQ. Overall, these results indicate that intrinsic nonlinear brain dynamics carry predictive information about affective dispositions, rather than domainspecific or network-localized cognitive abilities such as IQ. This work demonstrates that nonlinear, multiscale network representations of resting-state brain activity provide a principled and predictive framework for modeling individual differences in enduring affective dispositions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.6%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.0%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
21
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%