Back

An AI-Assisted Workflow for Reconstruction, Extension, and Calibration of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models.

Goryanin, I.; Checkley, S.; Demin, O.; Goryanin, I.

2026-04-07 systems biology
10.64898/2026.04.05.716273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractsO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSQuantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models provide mechanistic insight into drug response but are limited by labor-intensive, expert-driven workflows. We developed an AI-assisted QSP (AI-QSP) framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) with SBML-based modeling to enable automated reconstruction, extension, and calibration of mechanistic models. MethodsThe framework was applied to a published CAR-T QSP model. The model was reconstructed in SBML and extended via LLM-guided prompts to incorporate key resistance mechanisms: T-cell exhaustion, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint regulation, and tumor antigen escape. Model development followed an iterative expert-in-the-loop workflow. The resulting model (21 reactions, 9 species) was calibrated to synthetic benchmark data using 19-parameter optimization. Model credibility was assessed using ASME V&V 40 and ICH M15 principles, including global sensitivity and profile-likelihood analyses. ResultsThe calibrated model reproduced benchmark dynamics with high accuracy (mean log-RMSE = 0.132). Sensitivity analysis identified CAR-T killing and bystander cytotoxicity as dominant drivers of tumor response. Profile-likelihood analysis showed 71% of parameters were practically identifiable, with remaining parameters prioritised for future data-driven refinement. ConclusionsAI-assisted QSP modeling enables reproducible, scalable model reconstruction and evolution while maintaining mechanistic transparency and regulatory alignment. This framework provides a foundation for accelerating model-informed drug development in cell and gene therapies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.5%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.4%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
15
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
17
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
22
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%