Association Between Hospital Tiers and Cardiogenic Shock Mortality: Mitigating the Transfer Penalty Through a Regionalized Hub-and-Spoke Model

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with high short-term mortality despite contemporary advances in care. The association between institutional cardiac capability and outcomes?particularly among transferred patients and after accounting for clinical instability?remains incompletely defined. Objectives: To evaluate the association between hierarchical hospital cardiac capability and in-hospital mortality using a latent measure of acute physiologic severity. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2016?2022), hospitals were classified into five hierarchical tiers ranging from non-PCI (Tier 1) to heart transplant/durable LVAD centers (Tier 5). Generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM) assessed the relationship between hospital tier and mortality. A latent "Acute Severity" construct?comprising cardiac arrest, acute kidney and liver injury, and mechanical ventilation?was incorporated to model the effects of clinical instability Results: Among an estimated 1,177,180 CS hospitalizations, most occurred at cardiac surgical and transplant/LVAD centers. Crude mortality declined stepwise from non-PCI hospitals (64.5%) to transplant/LVAD centers (36.5%). After adjustment, higher hospital tier was independently associated with lower mortality (Tier 2 OR 0.43 [95% CI 0.38?0.48]; Tier 3 OR 0.37 [0.32?0.43]; Tier 4 OR 0.33 [0.30?0.38]; Tier 5 OR 0.35 [0.31?0.40]). Although transfer-in status was associated with increased mortality (OR 1.39 [1.33?1.46]), this association was attenuated at cardiac surgical and transplant/LVAD centers, consistent with a mitigation of transfer associated risk. Conclusions: Higher hospital cardiac capability is independently associated with lower mortality in CS. Advanced centers are associated with mitigation transfer-associated risk, supporting regionalized hub-and-spoke systems with early referral to high-capability centers.